Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takanjism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Takanjism

According to the article itself, this is a religion founded in 2006 with three known adherents. Two Google hits, both DeviantArt pages. I support their religious self-determination and wish them well, but... AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 01:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, unverifiable (WP:V).--blue520 02:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Deleting the article now will accomplish nothing. When there finally are several outside sources, all the work will be lost. Perhaps we can let this wait a month or two, and if you still think there's nothing supporting it, it can be deleted. Zack Green 02:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Well, you can certainly save it in a text file or something, and you could always go to deletion review to get it undeleted if new sources come to light. - AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 02:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I understand that Wikipedia has strict policy, but can I possibly get a bit of a grace period to establish some sources for this? Zack Green 03:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. " it can be classified as a new religious movement." It can be classified as non-notable, and something made up in school. Wikipedia is not a bulletin board to publicize new religions. (Fourth one this week. At least this one doesn't involve worshipping anime characters.) Fan1967 03:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - become notable outside Wikipedia first, then we'll write about you. Andy Saunders 12:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable, vanity, etc. WarpstarRider 19:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, non notable, etc etc. Nortelrye 22:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.