Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactics Arena

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 22:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tactics Arena

Tactics Arena (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only claim to notability: "Considered famous". Was marked for prod[1], prod was removed[2] a couple of hours later by an IP that appears to be almost the sole contributor. With no significant claims to notability I suggest that this fails WP:WEB. The article has already been speedy deleted once as R1 (not relevant to this discussion), and *twice* as A7 (I make no claim that this is a repost, so not calling for G4). Note also that while he/she did not create this article, User:Su yeul seems to be creating a barrage of Tactics Arena-related pages, most of which are now currently tagged for speedy deletion as either copyvios or nonsense/no-context (consisting almost entirely of a copy of the ranking from the Tactics Arena site). Confusing Manifestation 07:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment As the most recent editor who placed the {{prod}} template, my concern was that there are a great many games on addictinggames.com, (and other similar sites) and aside from gaming forums/sites, I could find no source in my Google search that this game has anything outstanding about it, or mentioned in terms of such games as World of Warcraft. I'd like to note also that a previous {{prod}} was placed on August 10th, and removed by the same IP in question, as well as a previous AfD that was placed, and removed by the same IP [3] Also of note, this page was deleted recently, listed as A1, but it also was a copy/paste from the same external link found in this article in question. Without access to deleted page history, I can't remember who initially was the author of the deleted article, but I do remember noticing it and while placing a CSD, someone else got there first. ^Ariel♥Gold 00:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless reviews/coverage are found from RS Corpx 04:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Corpx. --Aarktica 17:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.