Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ta-Shma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 16:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ta-Shma

Ta-Shma (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable. Rips apart WP:NPOV. Sounds like an advert. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 21:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete-per nom.--TrUCo9311 21:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom, non-notable. Cheers, LAX 21:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Doctorfluffy (talk) 21:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: They do have a CD [1], and there are some reviews out there [2]. They appear to more popular on collage stations than commercial broadcast. Being on the fence here, I'll just add my comment rather than throwing an opinion either way. Yngvarr 21:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep — Seems interesting. Not every day you bump onto Orthodox Jewish rappers, lol. — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 03:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment Of course, generally speaking that's one of the arguments generally considered to be unpersuasive at AfD. If you haven't all ready done so you might want to look at WP:INTERESTING. Xymmax (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. Despite my comment above, it *is* interesting. Unfortunately, they also don't quite pass the notability threshold. With more information it might be possible to fit them into the "most prominent representative of a notable style" category of WP:MUSIC, although I'm not certain that Hasidic rap is distinctive enough to qualify. Anyway, at this point they appear to fall a bit short. Xymmax (talk) 14:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.