Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TTC By-Law 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-27 11:58Z

[edit] TTC By-Law 1

TTC By-Law 1 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article violates Wikipedia:Don't include copies of primary sources. Ample time has been given to the original creator of this article to do something about it, and nothing has happened. Because the entire text of the By-Law is not included here, it is not a suitable candidate for being transwikied to WikiSource. Ground Zero | t 22:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete pure copy of a primary source easily available elsewhere with no other content. Probably speedyable as a copyvio as it breaches TTC rules on reproduction of content - iridescenti (talk to me!) 22:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Iridescenti and the nominator. This article restates what is already written somewhere else, definite copyvio. --Cyrus Andiron 15:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Wikipedia is certainly not a law book. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 16:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Alvestrand 19:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - dumping the text of a bylaw is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. And the bylaw itself is rather pointless as an article. -- Whpq 23:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.