Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNTlite
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Nominator appears to have withdrawn. -Splashtalk 00:55, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] TNTlite
Self-advertisement, has no outside links or contributors. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNTmips. --David Wahler (talk) 20:39, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I was very glad to find this article on the Wikipedia the other day, since I had been looking for a free GIS program. Trying to find something like that using Google had proved to be nearly impossible. I agree that the article needs work. I've now downloaded the program but not installed it. After I've installed it, I should be able to improve the article. Note: The article has been wikified by me, and there have been two other editors besides the original anon, so David Wahler is incorrect when he states that there are no outside links and no contributors. BlankVerse ∅ 21:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have been more clear; I meant that there were no links from other articles, and that there were no contributions of new content. I didn't mean to imply that your contributions weren't appreciated, I just feel that this program isn't particularly notable, and that Wikipedia isn't necessarily the best place to make it notable. --David Wahler (talk) 21:59, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- I originally found the article through the List of GIS software, but you deleted that link (see [1]) just before creating this AFD! That's one way to make the facts fit your argument. BlankVerse ∅ 14:25, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- You know, in retrospect this doesn't seem like such a good idea. Please understand, I'm relatively new here and didn't mean any harm -- just trying to be bold. I apologize if acted too rashly. No hard feelings, right? --David Wahler (talk) 02:10, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have been more clear; I meant that there were no links from other articles, and that there were no contributions of new content. I didn't mean to imply that your contributions weren't appreciated, I just feel that this program isn't particularly notable, and that Wikipedia isn't necessarily the best place to make it notable. --David Wahler (talk) 21:59, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
