Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNA weekly pay-per-view, weeks 1-10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-26 14:44Z

Also deleted:

Template:TNAweekly (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

[edit] TNA weekly pay-per-view, weeks 1-10

TNA weekly pay-per-view, weeks 1-10 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Basically a weekly TV show. Not notable. Has just about as many as episodes of iMPACT!. Brief information already on main PPV page. Aaru Bui ^DII 01:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages:

TNA weekly pay-per-view, weeks 11-20 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

TNA weekly pay-per-view, weeks 21-30 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

TNA weekly pay-per-view, weeks 51-60 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

TNA weekly pay-per-view, weeks 81-90 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Delete all per nom. Bigtop 02:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. MER-C 03:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom, little more than a TV show. TJ Spyke 04:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all per WP:TV, WP:TVE--Winypoter 08:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
  • That would only apply to the entertainment side of the show, mainly the storylines and characters, which those articles have little of and are generally about the sporting side, the wrestling. --Aaru Bui ^DII 12:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nomination. Normy132 09:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

If anyone's interested: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TNA iMPACT! results, April 2006 --Aaru Bui ^DII 12:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom & precedent (Aaru Bui's link above). SkierRMH 20:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom & indiscriminate collection of information. It may also be speedy since it is essentially a recreation of previously deleted pages.--Nick Y. 21:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all. Two hour wrestling PPVs are notable enough for me (see In Your House. Mshake3 04:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Well those weren't weekly and there weren't 110 of them. --Aaru Bui ^DII 04:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
    • 28 is still a lot, and there could have been several more if WWE wanted too. Weekly shouldn't make a difference. Mshake3 04:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all. Are we going to document every minute of TV ever broadcasted? We don't have articles describing every match of a certain week of the soccer season in some country, even though they all get long summaries in TV shows, and often are broadcasted completely and reported on in the mainstream media. I fail to see how this is any different, except that AFAIK it doesn't get much coverage in the mainstream press, making it even less notable. An article about the show, no problem, but not this week-after-week summary please. Fram 08:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. Govvy 22:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all. If people are going to get picky about PPV events, then the UK only WWE PPVs should go as well. Many are very non-notable, and seem to exist just because it's a PPV (which people always seem to assume makes it completely notable). Same goes for Heroes of Wrestling, a one time PPV event that was basically a "legends" show that flopped horribly. In my opinion, if weekly TNA PPV events go, many others need to as well. There is others I'm sure as well. RobJ1981 17:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all Nonnotable and rediculous to be covered in Wikipedia. Davidpdx 07:29, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.