Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAMER M RASHDAN

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 08:38, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TAMER M RASHDAN

Vanity. Delete.-gadfium 02:04, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. ✏ OvenFresh² 02:08, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• I'm sure he's a swell chap, but nothing remotely close to meriting an entry in Wikipedia. Delete. older≠wiser 02:10, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the CV. Wyss 02:52, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Rhobite 03:15, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nice guy...but he didn't read Da Roolz. - Lucky 6.9 03:33, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. --Idont Havaname 04:20, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, article does not establish notability, possible vanity. Megan1967 06:33, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this guy is not-notable. The first thing that comes to my mind when reading it is "So what?" Zzyzx11 08:26, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not important, needs to turn the caps lock off. Average Earthman 10:42, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete pretty much a textbook example of a vanity page. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:06, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Carrp | Talk 04:08, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.