Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sze kui ng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted - no assertation of notability.. Shell ^babelfish 01:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sze kui ng

Sze kui ng (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neither independent nor reliable sources, notability not established. Of course, if he had indeed proven the Riemann hypothesis last year, as he claims in the linked text, he would by now be one of the most famous mathematicians alive (this is one of the hardest and best known problems in mathematics, unsolved since the 19th century). But this is not a peer-reviewed paper (Arxiv.org accepts almost all uploaded eprints, but the fact that they classified this paper as "General mathematics" rather than putting it in its specific category is a more than slight hint that they had their doubts, see the correspoding remark in the ArXiv article). High on a tree 23:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC) PS: The article Chun Xuan Jiang by the same editor has been speedily deleted, as CSD A7.

• Speedy-A7, the creator of the article demonstrated little understanding of wikipedia policies, and this is reflected in the article.--Cronholm¹⁴⁴ 01:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete per Cronholm, tagged Rackabello 01:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.