Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System Simulation Ltd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman 18:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] System Simulation Ltd

System Simulation Ltd (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

The company has notable clients and devised computer systems for them, but I don't think that passes WP:CORP. There's limited RS coverage and it doesn't indicate notability. Ghits appear to be primarily directory listings. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 02:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per nomination. This would appear to be a business that has carved out a niche market for itself; it takes nothing from that achievement to note that it is rather obscure. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong keep — this company is a leading company in the cultural technology sector with independent references. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Major company in very specialised field. That the field is obscure doesnt prevent the company from being notable within it. Developing the computer systems for the specialised basic enterprise activity of very notable organisations is significant. DGG (talk) 03:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Going to disagree here, WP:CORP says, "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." That is simply not proven here and there's no evidence (see my results above) that it exists. Of the three sources, one is the company's own site and two are 'bios' from its clients. Neither establishes notability and they don't appear to establish notability. I can say what I want about a company, but I thought core guidelines/policy of WP rely on that being verified. Thoughts? TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 11:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong keep - Both the Animated channel 4 logo and animations for the Alien film (both notable acheivments at the time) were developed here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seo01 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.