The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom--Jusjih 18:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:05, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Localzuk(talk) 20:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. The Photon 00:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. An amazingly uninformative article. EdJohnston 01:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete as spam, tagged. ColourBurst 05:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.