Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SysProtect

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nothing worth merging. Neıl ☎ 14:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SysProtect

SysProtect (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Basic recreation of the Vundo page, offers no helpful information that can be found there. In fact that article is of low quality but I intend to rewrite it... a bit. The whole thing is full of non-existent pictures of dialog boxes. Waste of server space and no use to anyone ;) ♥ Fredil 15:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep and Merge relevant information into parent article. Delete the rest, which is just a rehash. scope_creep (talk)
I would have done that, but it looks to me like there isn't any relevant/useful information that can be salvaged. If anyone wants to prove me wrong, please do. ♥ Fredil 21:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~Eliz81(C) 10:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete If there is anythng to salvage then merge it but if there's nothing, there's nothing. Hammer1980·talk 23:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge into Vundo. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • delete or merge if anything useful, else leave redirect to vundo--CastAStone|(talk) 04:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and Merge relevant information into parent article. 67.168.65.207 (talk) 16:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - There are no sources and hardly any content and this amounts actually to spam for a non notable remedy (which seems to have side effects) against a maybe also not notable virus. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.