Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syntax pretentious

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 21:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Syntax pretentious

• del neologism that failed to get prominence. mikka (t) 07:11, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unless a Yoda speech pattern article someday we want.  :) Jamie 07:47, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Object Subject Verb. Interested, you may be, hmm? Saberwyn - 10:31, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: Keep if a source is cited and the obvious NPOV issues are worked out (both things that I've tried to get the author/contributors to do for a week now). Otherwise, delete.--Hraefen 15:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless someone knows an accepted Linguistic typology term for it. Gazpacho 00:42, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.