Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sylvia Ada Wachuku
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Robert 14:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sylvia Ada Wachuku
I'd like the community opinion on this one. The article appears to be a vanity one relating to the Wachuku family generally - see AfD on Ugonna Wachuku above. While she has made positive contributions to education in Nigeria, I feel there is inadequate notability for an encyclopedia article. I am unable to verify (but don't actually doubt) some teaching awards in secondary schools and a religious knowledge workbook. If the subject had been European, I would just have put a prod tag on the article so there may be some reverse systemic bias at work here.
- Delete as per my nom. Dlyons493 Talk 11:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Very Weak Keep. Potentially notable as close relative of major political figure (Jaja Wachuku). We have Roger Clinton, Jr., after all. Tevildo 12:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete being related to someone notable is not notability in itself. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, being related to a notable figure does not make someone notable. The awards really aren't notable on a national/international scale. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugonna Wachuku. --Coredesat 20:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per other delete votes. Being the sister-in-law of the speaker of the Nigerian House of Representatives does not merit an article; I certainly can't name any of Dennis Hastert's sisters-in-law. --Metropolitan90 01:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.