Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Arshad Hussain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Syed Arshad Hussain

Syed Arshad Hussain (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The CV of a run-of-the-mill researcher who has published a lot of in-field work. Corvus cornix 17:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 19:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Every academic publishes. Non-notable. MarkBul 20:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:PROF. OfficeGirl 21:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No indication he's made any notable contributions to his field, reads too much like a CV. Thomjakobsen 22:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as it looks like a resume and potentially (although not official) a possibly copyvio.--JForget 23:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• Very Weak keep Every academic publishes, some enough to be notable--and of course notable work is in-field--I do not quite understand the reason for deletion. .To determine the importance of the work we do not rely of our own view here of what is a run-of-the-mill researcher , but see what the people in the special field thing, as best measured by citations--unfortunately WoS shows a maximum of 5.

Now comes the hard part--this is probably not enough for notability of a scientist in a major country; but is it notability in terms of his own country and its scientific and academic structure? He';s from apparently a particular poor region of India--India is general is not a backwards country, and he would not be notable by the standard of Indian physics--whether the claim for regional distinction is valid is hard to evaluate. DGG (talk) 05:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.