Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Ahmed2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 15:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Syed Ahmed
propose speedy delete, for article was deleted in May and has staged a comeback. fails WP:BIO. unsourced articles full of speculation about someone who appears to be a legend in his own mind Ohconfucius 05:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO. Michael 07:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep I hate game show contestant entries, but if any are to be kept this one is. Check Google news search. It's the tabloids, but notable nonetheless. Bustter 11:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Rangek 13:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, numerous newspaper articles. --Darksun 16:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of UK-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 00:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - I didn't like the guy one bit, but of all the contestants on the show, he's easily among the three most famous (along with winner Michelle and runner-up Ruth Badger). It was a hit series that attracted high ratings - but most importantly, his private life has been featured in various newspapers on a number of occasions since the show ended. He's a known subject of the UK press, and for that reason I think he's notable enough. Seb Patrick 11:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep This is newsworthy - it's tabloid but then isn't most press these days? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulobrad (talk • contribs)
- take to DRV with the old article which was arguarbly a higher quality, and then merge content together Benon 01:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.