Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiftcover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Swiftcover

It's a insurance company. This article was prodded, but the creator moved the tag. The original prodder replaced the tag in violation of prod guidelines (but I'm sure with no ill intent). Moving here as contested. NickelShoe 19:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Jay(Reply) 23:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I know I just jumped on somebody for this a day or two ago, but please remember that AfD is a discussion, not a vote. You need to give a reason for your opinion, and "per nom" isn't one in this case, because all I said was that it was an insurance company that had been prodded. Are you implying that being an insurance company means it has to be deleted, or that being prodded means it should be deleted? Because either way, your argument so far is pretty unpersuasive. NickelShoe 11:36, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete per WP:CORP. Stifle 16:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.