Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweet Ermengarde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --- Deville (Talk) 02:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sweet Ermengarde

Does not assert notability or discuss the plot. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 02:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and allow for organic expansion. Substubbery isn't criteria for deletion, and this is a story by an obviously notable author. --Daniel Olsen 02:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Unsure. There are a number of new stubs like this one representing Lovecraft's "miscellaneous writings"--short, rather goofy non-horror items written mainly as jokes, plus some horror fragments; this one is a parody of romantic melodrama. It's possible to write a brief description of each one, along with the circumstances under which they were written; each of these gets a couple of paragraphs in An H. P. Lovecraft Encyclopedia. How notable these things are, I don't know. Nareek 03:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand to match quality of other articles linked to List of works by H. P. Lovecraft. (Some are just as short, but have citations.) --Dennette 10:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

It's now been expanded a bit--I don't think that it can be expanded a heck of a lot more, so people can judge pretty well whether it's a notable-enough subject for an article. I guess, having put a little work into it, I would change my vote to Keep. Nareek 04:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.