Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweeney Young
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 09:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sweeney Young
Contested prod, reason given at that time was "non-notable person, no references, no solid information, not even considered a stub by wiki-class. User is unidentified, and has no other edits. possibly purely promotional and crystal balling." Prod was removed without explanation by an anon IP and the only additions since have been by vandals. --Finngall talk 05:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A google search shows up no reliable hits for this actor. Moreover, the subject in question fails notability guidelines as well. Finally, according to the article, he has not won any noteworthy awards for his acting. --Siva1979Talk to me 05:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Deleting this article is not necessary. Sweeney Young is an actor soon to be appearing in a show that has a high relevance in the culture of Australia. To delete it would be, in my opinion, racist.(the previous was added by User:WmurphPedro | Chat 11:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The above says it all "is an actor soon to be appearing". When the actor appears in a notable show then there may be a case (although not guaranteed). Untill then the articles fails notability guidelines. Pedro | Chat 11:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable actor who has had a couple of small bit parts in a couple of TV shows, by the looks of it. --Stormie 12:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. Realkyhick 18:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I put up the tag originally. Non-Notable, etc. Hellswasteland 18:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable actor; when his resume gets bigger and people are talking about him in reliable sources, we'll see about an article. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - And any nimrod who calls that action racist should be kicked off Wikipedia for not making good faith arguments. DreamGuy 20:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - simply not notable enough yet. No reliable sources to back up claim to notability. Most certainly doesn't meet requirements at WP:BIO. 'Nuff said. --clpo13(talk) 06:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Anyone who calls someone a nimrod should be kicked off wikipedia because that is a blatant racial slur. The good people of the Nimroddyal Coast will not stand for this. I am shocked and/or appauld at the level of racism rampant in the wikipedia family.
http://tvweek.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=157713
http://www.tv.com/sweeney-young/person/303609/summary.html
http://akas.imdb.com/name/nm2034948/maindetails
Keep him. Lordofthesheep 06:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.