Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was transwiki-fied. Mailer Diablo 21:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Swank
Dicdef followed by ...I don't know what. Transwikied, speedied, prodded, deprodded, the works. I doubt Wiktionary wants any part of this. Weregerbil 18:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Swank (magazine), which I'm surprised doesn't have content (already listed on List of pornographic magazines) as that's been around for a long, long time. --Kickstart70-T-C 18:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Highschoolkidforumcruft. Fan1967 19:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete The term of art here is "crufty-cruft". (O RLY?) - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 19:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete CSD A7 as well as WP:NFT Hobbeslover talk/contribs 20:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, stream of consciousness babbling. and Wiktionary has an swank entry. - Motor (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Would a redirect to Hilary Swank be inappropriate? TheProject 05:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I made an article on the porn magazine at Swank (magazine), so it can be moved to Swank, or Swank can be made a disambiguation page, whichever people think is appropriate. PseudoAnon 06:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, no redirect per Kjkolb and PseudoAnon. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.