Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swampass

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Swampass

(Contested prod) Wikipedia is not an urban dictionary. — ERcheck (talk) 05:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as a neologism with little in the way of verifiability that I was able to track down. (I tagged this as a speedy, but the author removed the tag and commented, so I didn't bother redoing it.) Tony Fox (arf!) 05:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to Wiktionary. Leuko 05:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:NFT. Ridiculous, unverifiable neologism. This same article has been speedied twice before under the name Swamp ass and twice again under Swamp Ass. Suggest page protection for all three articles should this AFD result in deletion. — NMChico24 05:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per NMChico24... unverifiable neologism, probably made up you-know-where. --Kinu t/c 05:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:NEO. No transwiki here, I don't think it's for neologisms. Asshat, cited by author as an example, is actually only a redirection page to Asshole. ColourBurst 05:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Actually, wiktionary will accept neologisms, however they still need to be verifiable. BS is still BS, no matter which project it's posted to. — NMChico24 05:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as before, crappy article. Gazpacho 07:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per NMChico24 --Mr Stephen 11:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NFT policy. -- The Anome 12:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Neologism. StuffOfInterest 14:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable neologism. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 22:03, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. —Khoikhoi 22:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable, poorly written. Jaedza 06:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.