Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Muktanandaji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as copyvio - Liberatore(T) 15:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Swami Muktanandaji

Non-notable religious figure with 40 Google hits. Delete and redirect to Muktananda. Contested PROD, so I'm not just doing it myself. Sandstein 06:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable person, changing my vote to no vote as there seems to be some confusion about the article as mentioned below by Henning Makholm--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Confused. Muktananda claims to be about one Swami Muktananda (who, with quotes, gets 89,000 google hits), but Swami Muktananda redirects to Swami Muktanandaji. The two articles cannot be about the same person; they give quite different vital stats. Perhaps Move all to Talk:Muktananda and slap on an {{expert}} tag? Henning Makholm 06:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

It is possible that the

• Delete An image-search [1] indicates that the two Muktananda's are different. ImpuMozhi 19:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain on this one, as I have never heard of this guy. I have been bold and fixed the redirect from Swami Muktananda to point to Muktananda. I've heard of him. Fan1967 23:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable person (more like a vanity article, in fact). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Article is a copyvio from here. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.