Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sw!ms
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Shimeru 07:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sw!ms
Notability not asserted, established, or sourced per WP:MUSIC. Declined speedy. RJASE1 Talk 18:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, though it is borderline. Three released albums though only one seems to have any significance. Their link to An Albatross and their festival appearances, plus (possibly) three albums leads me to want to give the benefit of the doubt. Mallanox 19:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
DeleteRe-direct - No assertion of notability, fails WP:MUSIC.--Bryson 01:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC). re-direct per Mgm.--Bryson 03:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)- Delete - Non notable. 2 albums and one EP, from local Scranton labels. They sound pretty good to me, but I don't think they need an article. Brianyoumans 01:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:MUSIC musician criterion number 5. "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable". - Mgm|(talk) 11:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- It is also possible to simply mention the side project in the main article, as is already the case. Brianyoumans 22:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of notability and reliable sources. I have concerns about the notability of An Albatross as well. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 16:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per all other delete nominations. BlackBear 20:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. — Wenli 22:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't believe An Albatross is notable enough to justify this article according to WP:MUSIC's criterion 5. Poeloq 09:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.