This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 02:03, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Google gets about 8 hits. Seems like she's only notable within her organization (and even that feels shakey)--InShaneee 14:36, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable. No LexisNexis hits either, for what that's worth. CDC(talk) 20:06, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Works for UNICEF - which would sound good, except I'm sure a lot of people work for UNICEF, and her title doesn't sound that high up the organisation. Average Earthman 22:27, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable. Megan1967 06:07, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.