Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne van Bommel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The arguments to delete per WP:RS and WP:N are based in policy. GDonato (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Suzanne van Bommel
This person is notable for being a candidate for an office. The article offers no sources, and my googling turned up only minimal sources; I am not convinced that she meets the notability criteria. Will she still be notable if she loses? In my opinion, no. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC) FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment No sources? Is the most significant thing this person did was being a candidate for office? That fails notability, IMHO. Winning a significant political race (senate, house, president) might make you notable, but not running for office (unless she was like 'the first woman to run for political office' or something like that). My vote: Seriously improve or Delete Mindraker 01:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No third party sources. jonathon 00:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I think she is notable a person in Canadian / Ontario politics. President of two riding associations, Chief of Staff to a sitting Minister and candidate for one of the two major parties in Canada. Even if she didn't win an election she is still an influential person in Canadian politics. 72.140.17.92 05:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
