Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Sinclair (United States)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus to delete, but will move. A merge/redirect could still happen but doesn't need AfD. W.marsh 03:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Suzanne Sinclair (United States)
She lost...in 2004. Notable? Not so. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 19:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to the election, per WP:C&E
- Not plausible: this is not a likely search term. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 22:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and rename Suzanne Sinclair (politician). Major party candidate for Congressional election. Owen 06:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect, not worth keeping as a distinct article. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 22:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- merge or redirect (not sure there is anything worth merging) to the main election article. JoshuaZ 03:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment: I can't find out how to remove this AfD from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 November 23: it does not appear to be transcluded there but shows up nonetheless. Any more experienced admins care to help? Thanks. Sandstein 09:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)-- Problem resolved thanks to Amarkov. Sandstein 21:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)- Delete per above, nothing worth merging and not a worthwile search term, too. MER-C 10:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete no assertion of notability beyond the fact she sought nomination, won and contested the seat (the usual process). Is there anything distinctive about her or her policies? Is she or her campaign remembered in US political circles? WJBscribe 10:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Sarge Baldy. The year is irrelevant. Just H 23:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Question. Just wondering, do those who support keeping the article feel that everyone who stands for election to any country's legislature (though maybe only for a 'major party') is automatically sufficiently notable for Wikipedia? This would seem the logical outcome to avoid a US-centric bias to the encyclopedia... WJBscribe 23:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable. And the title is awful too - if this ends up as keep then it really should be moved! Inner Earth 21:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect per people that chose redirect. Delete's a bit harsh, but certainly not uncalled for. --Wizardman 02:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.