Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Fournier
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Kubigula (talk) 03:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Suzanne Fournier
The article does not assert notability βcommand 15:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Doesn't seem notable enough to merit a full biography, external links don't even work, and any third party coverage would still fail the WP:NOT#NEWS test presumably.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep:
- Google News archive[1]
- Washington Post[2]
- Lexington Herald-Leader[3]
- Re the Editor & Publisher links for this article: there's no requirement that links work, sources be free or readily available online when establishing notability.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 03:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 03:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletions. -- A. B. (talk) 03:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per A. B.. 'nuff said. -MrFizyx (talk) 04:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- 'Keep per the sources. DGG (talk) 11:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
