Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanna Sherry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep -- Samir 17:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suzanna Sherry

Suzanna Sherry (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable Ghost Yacht 21:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Is it too much asked that the nominator at least states why he thinks it's NN? Malc82 18:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• So I have to put forward a case for why I think this person isn't notable, rather than somebody having to put a case for why she is notable, as if people are notable unless proven otherwise? Bizarre! Ghost Yacht 11:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete The external links contain two references to external sources about her. I don't think that's quite enough to meet the threshold of WP:PROF. It's borderline. YechielMan 23:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 01:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong keep and expand. Sherry's books are widely read, significant, and certainly noteable contributions to the academic literature on American constitutional law and the role of the federal courts. Newyorkbrad 03:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep With those two works, it meets the general WP:N, and with the additional information about her publications it meets WP:PROF. She holds a named full professorship at a major university law school, and such people are almost always notable. DGG 04:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 02:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Delete: She is mildly impressive, but here are thousands of law professors who could have similar, if not more substantial articles. WikiFishy 02:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Erring on the side of caution here and think it should stay. Corpx 05:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, named professor at a prominent law school, and lectures at others law schools[1]. John Vandenberg 23:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per nom. --Infrangible 01:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per malformed nomination which leaves us all guessing. RFerreira 06:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.