Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainability depletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 16:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sustainability depletion

Sustainability depletion (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It does not appear to be a term in common usage and the topic is covered at Resource depletion -- Alan Liefting talk 04:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• Transwiki unless its expanded, to wiki dictionary, because as is, it is just a definition Corpx 01:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

It could be considered to be oxymoron and does not deserve to be transwikified. -- Alan Liefting talk 03:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

• ’’’Delete’’’. Is entirely original research, entirely unsourced, and contains no content of significance or substance. Is not expandable. There is no definition given for the peculiar term. I suspect that the page was created as an experiment. --SmokeyJoe 06:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - nonsense term. Appears to be made up. Prove its notability, or delete it. The Transhumanist    22:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:OR neologism without WP:RS. But the link to depleted uranium is funny. Leibniz 12:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.