Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suspense Digest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Suspense Digest

Suspense Digest (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
  • Delete Notability. Avi (talk) 06:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 02:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Neutral: It certainly does exist - there are 97 hits on the Pakistani Google [1] - but that doesn't look terribly notable.  RGTraynor  21:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: A Google search and LexisNexis news search do not turn up much coverage in reliable sources. The claim that it is the "largest circulated monthly Urdu magazine in Pakistan" would be enough for me to presume that the lack of available sources is due to an inability to find/access them rather than an actual absence of coverage if only the claim were verified. – Black Falcon (Talk) 20:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: This magazine exists, I've read it myself when I used to live in Pakistan. The reason for the low hit count on google is because it is an urdu magazine, and does not maintain a website of it's own as far as I'm aware. Most Pakistanis who use the internet are English speakers or type in Romanized Urdu so that may be a reason for the small number of search engine hits. I don't know about it's circulation figures, but it is certainly notable enough to keep. Zaindy87 (talk) 01:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.