Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Herndon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep (non-admin). Gary King (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Susan Herndon
Fails WP:MUSIC. No third party sources and lack of search information yields no notable information. Delete Undeath (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep How deep was your search for additional materials? Her work has appeared on a nationally syndicated radio program. The album In the Attic is available for purchase and digital download on amazon.com [1]. Agreed, article needs to be better sourced. As a start, the actual NPR source clip from All Songs Considered could be used as third party source. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 19:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It now has one third party source and uses that source to make an assertion of notability. I'm in the process of improving it :). Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment The Tulsa source is hardly a third party source. It's a local "whats going on" type of thing. It's a local online deal just like most cities have. The amazon source is nothing special either. Just because a site sells the cd's does not make the band notable. For one, it needs a review from a third party source. Preferably, a source outside of Oklahoma. Undeath (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- I know the sources may be local, but I am doing my best to improve it! :) Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- There is no "may be" about it. The tulsa world is a local article. I've searched for notable attributes about this singer and can find nothing. She has not toured the U.S. She is not signed to a big label. She has no reviews. She only has albums for sale. That does not constitute notability. Undeath (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- The Urban Tulsa site is just like the tulsa world. It does not assert notability. Undeath (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- What about All Songs Considered? Does that not count as a third party source? (User talk:wolfmantheo) 07:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- The Urban Tulsa site is just like the tulsa world. It does not assert notability. Undeath (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- There is no "may be" about it. The tulsa world is a local article. I've searched for notable attributes about this singer and can find nothing. She has not toured the U.S. She is not signed to a big label. She has no reviews. She only has albums for sale. That does not constitute notability. Undeath (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- I know the sources may be local, but I am doing my best to improve it! :) Seraphim♥ Whipp 00:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - appears to meet WP:MUSIC. Give it another 24 hours per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 20:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
