This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion(talk) 12:55, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, neologism. It gets over 1,500 Google hits but only because it seems to be the name of an online graphics design company, which also does not seem to merit an article. — Ливай | ☺ 20:09, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, probably another vanity neologism. Wyss 21:14, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
And a nonsense one at that. Delete. humblefool® 23:40, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.