Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suprnova.org

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. —Korath (Talk) 17:08, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Suprnova.org

We're discussing other BitTorrent-related sites (Torrentmind and Filesoup, see above), and whatever decision applies to them should also apply here. I'm in favor of Merging the lot of them into the main BitTorrent article. Radiant! 08:45, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC) Okay, I shouldn't listen to sock puppets stating "It makes no sense that X has an entry, and Y can't.". Request withdrawn. Radiant! 11:28, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

• Half a million google hits says keep it right where it is buddy. —RaD Man (talk) 08:55, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Yeah. Keep. —Korath (Talk) 09:43, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
• The most obvious Keep I have done so far. Xezbeth 09:45, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
• This was attempted with Goatse.cx - merging it into Shock site, but there was too much information on goatse so the article got spun out again. Keep, as I only see the goatse scenario repeating itself. --Dave2 10:49, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• One of the most notable BitTorrent sites, if not the most notable. Strong Keep. cesarb 23:03, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep a very notable web site -- Longhair 03:10, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Probably the most notable BT site. -- pne 15:38, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.