Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supreme Mathematics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, nomination by vandal, nobody else reccomends deletion. Also the issue of the nominator voting after his nomination, and claiming sockpuppets for no good reason. Complain about my boldness if you feel like it. -Amarkov blahedits 01:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Supreme Mathematics

Supreme Mathematics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

non notable - 9000 google hits [1], vs. .5 million for Lutheranism [2]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.146.140.75 (talk • contribs)

  • Keep no reason given to delete. Significant teachings of a significant religious movement. ReverendG 22:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 9000 google hits. delete. non notalbe not significan. spam. of Wikipdia as platform. possible sockpuppets and single article accounts.--137.146.140.75 23:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This article is significant for research purposes.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.32.145 (talk • contribs)
  • Keep It is entirely irrelevant how many hits this gets compared to Lutheranism. That isn't a Wikipolicy. Additionally, the anonymous nominator (137.146.140.75) who put this up for AfD is a vandal. [3], [4], [5]. This is most likely a bad-faith nomination. IrishGuy talk 00:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - As per Irish guy, this is probably a bad nomination.... Spawn Man 00:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • The AFD article was incorrectly titled and not listed in the daily log. I have moved and listed it. Fan-1967 00:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • This article makes my head hurt. Keep, but cleanup and put it in language that's actually understandable by someone not in the cult. --humblefool® 00:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep nomination in bad faith? Weak reason, not to mention 9000 seems notable Killerhun00 00:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. The reasons given in the blurb is an outright non-sequitur (comparing this to Lutheranism? Gimme a break!), and s/he's giving a litany of reasons that mean nothing in the actual cast. I call bad faith as well. --Dennisthe2 00:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - at this point, I'm going to add to my listing that I suspect the user is also trying to prove a point for some reason (ref WP:POINT). This is strictly by instinct - AMMV. --Dennisthe2 00:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep and heavy cleanup. Nominated by a regular vandal with no real reasoning. --Wafulz 00:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.