Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior Wealth Creation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 01:21, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Superior Wealth Creation

Advertising MNewnham 00:32, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Support as per nom. josh (talk) 01:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom Tom Harrison ^(talk) 03:12, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. --Thephotoman 06:53, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Bkwillwm 07:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete pile on, spam xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 17:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I have removed the links from the page, they can obviously be replaced in the unlikely event that this passes AfD. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• WEAK Delete unless the article can be rewritten in a non advertising manner Jcuk 20:07, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, it's not hard to rewrite to be factual.--Aleron235 23:22, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as there is no notable information other than the (now removed) references. —Onlyemarie 07:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ad --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.