Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superhero!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Superhero!

Superhero! (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

wikipedia is not a crystal ball movie not in producation no cast info Oo7565 20:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

  • delete per nomOo7565 20:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless someone can add a good reason to keep (IMO the production isn't notable enough to warrant the violation of WP:CRYSTAL, but since it's an ungooglable title, there could be a legitimate reason to keep it. The article as it stands doesn't warrant a keep — iridescenti (talk to me!) 21:23, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOT#CBALL. "...uncertain what the release date will be...", "...tentatively confirmed...", "...exclamation point at the end of the title is unconfirmed...", "Some sources...", "while one internet rumor site..." With all this speculative sounding language and even a reference (a reference that decreases this articles authority!) that debunks what was on prior versions of this article, it's clear this article needs to die. —Mitaphane ?|! 17:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete — Per WP:CRYSTAL. ~ Magnus animuM  BRAIN FREEZE! 21:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Bulldog123 22:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per Magnus animum. --Random Say it here! 22:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Week keep - Took the above as call for cleanup, axed the unsourced, weasel-word laden gibberish. Just a tiny stub at this point, though. MrZaiustalk 11:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Infrangible 18:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.