Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superdrol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Superdrol

Superdrol (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This is a previously deleted article for a non-notable product. The "article" does not establish notability other than being a brand of prohormone/designer steroid. The information used to assert notability is unsourced, or is simply culled from marketing that was used by the manufacturer itself about its own product. Note that no other discontinued brand of prohormone (Nortesten, Anotesten, Androsol, 1-AD for example) has it's own Wikipedia entry - despite that there were over 50 other brands on the market at one time. Nor do any designer steroids save for Tetrahydrogestrinone and Desoxymethyltestosterone which has an article under it's chemical name (not as "The Clear" or "Madol" as they were branded/commonly known). And while this particular product is no longer sold, the brand of supplements - "Anabolic Extreme" - is still in existance, making this a possible advertisement. Of note, the user who created and primarily contributed to the article has not made any other Wikipedia edits other than to promote this product/brand. Quartet 15:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

• delete maybe redirect to steroid RogueNinja_talk 19:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
• delete per nom. Not notable and no verfiable sources from which to create an entry.--Yankees76 (talk) 01:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Google scholar appears to have a couple of decent sources[1], including what appears to be a paper in the The American Journal of Gastroenterology about SuperDrol, and the drug was part of an investigation by the Washington Post[2]. I think it meets the notability threshold and a decent article could be written.--Kubigula (talk) 04:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. For what it's worth, I will commit to cleaning up the article if it's kept. I'm reluctant to spend the effort when the consensus here is leaning towards deletion.--Kubigula (talk) 17:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for reasons listed above. Redirect to Anabolic steroid. Any verifiable info from links above about this drug can be listed there. --Komrade Kiev (talk) 13:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• delete not notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.