Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superdon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Superdon

Delete. I find no evidence that the word 'Superdon' actually exists anywhere except in this article. No examples or citations are given in the text of the article. No examples appear in Google except for the article itself and a crib from it on another site. In these circumstances the article is just an invention.--Smerus 17:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as neologism. Maybe userfy it to whoever created it, seems fairly well-written. Kuzaar 17:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Move to TV dons and keep the list. Tyrenius 18:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: I ain't never 'eard of it, and I read the Guardian and listen to Radio 4. --die Baumfabrik 06:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

• I'm not arguing for keeping the term - just the list of such people who appear in the media. It is a recogised phenomenon. Tyrenius 22:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.