Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Sonic Ninja Warriors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Super Sonic Ninja Warriors

Appears to be about a mostly-nonexistant fan work, illustrated with a vast number of copyvio images. --Carnildo 06:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Also delete related SSNW Episode Guide --TheFarix (Talk) 16:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I know, dude, but i've been working hard on it, so try to leave it, as it's my private article. And i'll use the infos i got in the whole article to make a flash movie series with friends of mine. AND sorry if there's too many copyrighted screenshots, but that's how the series will be looking like (at least, will try to make them look like Sonic X(Though it will take us a LOT of time)). AND, I NEED THAT STUFF TO MAKE THE FLASH SERIES. So, don't delete it, OK? --Metal Sonic 08:56, 1 August 2006
  • Delete - seriously, guy, you need to go and read what Wikipedia is actually about. It's not a webhost for your "private article" and stuff you "need to make a flash series". It's an encyclopaedia, every page of which is accessible to millions of people who come here looking for information. A page such as this is, I'm sorry to say, a complete waste of Wikipedia server space and an abuse of what the facilities exist for. If you want to host all that stuff online somewhere as a reference point for yourself and your friends, there are countless places you can do it - Wikipedia most certainly isn't one of them. Seb Patrick 11:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and by support of that argument by the primary author of the article. -- Koffieyahoo 08:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with fire, or userfy. "It's my private article" See WP:OWN (and this is why I propose userfying). "I'll use the info in the article to make a flash movie series" Can't you keep it elsewhere and take Wikipedia seriously? "I NEED [the images] TO MAKE THE FLASH SERIES" Wikipedia is not a mirror or repository of images. Morgan Wick 09:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• .....do whatever you want guys. I'm proud of myself for creating such fine piece of Sonic stuff. --Metal Sonic 13:25, 1 August 2006
• Delete but don't userfy as userpages are supposed to be (at least tangentially) related to wikipedia. Ruaraidh-dobson 11:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn vanity fanfiction not covered by WP:FICT. Also appears to have ownership issues as well so it may need to be salted. --TheFarix (Talk) 12:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As per above and the user own admission. However can he be given time or at elast userfy it for a week, I would hate to see someone lose all that information because they made an honest mistake. --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 14:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Guys... thanks for info about freewebs:))). --Metal Sonic 16:39, 1 August 2006
• Delete per above, no pages are private. --PresN 16:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Wikipedia is not a free webhost, and that's why I oppose userfication in overt cases like this. Geogre 17:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, copyright issues, WP:NOT free webspace, WP:OWN problems. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, do not userfy, Fanfics/fanworks are usually non-notable and absolutely do not belong on Wikipedia. Speedy the images as copyvios. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, not a web host. -Royalguard11^Talk 23:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.