Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Mario 64 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. Rx StrangeLove 04:57, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Super Mario 64 2

Would like to speedy delete but need to consider if it is indeed notable.--Jondel 02:39, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete--Jondel 02:39, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• I smell a hoax. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 03:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Note: Before voting, check out it's google results. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.127.115 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• [1] Speedy keep. Legitimate game that was cancelled. - A Link to the Past (talk) 07:06, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Super Mario 64 under sub-category "Sequels". PRueda29 02:40, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge per PRueda29. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 03:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
  • There's plenty of information that can be acquired about this game that would make the Sequels section far too bulky. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:34, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 09:03, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
• keep and please expand on this topic it is not a hoax Yuckfoo 17:11, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and expand, as per A Link to the Past. Carioca 22:43, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete a cancelled game is NN --Rogerd 03:50, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Not if there was sufficient hype and press coverage about its development. We actually have an entire list of cancelled video games. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:52, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Super Mario 64 2. It can concievably be split again if it turns out this section grows too long, but since there's very little verifiable information about it, I doubt that will be a problem. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 15:40, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - If we put every bit of vapourware on Wikipedia we'd have a lot of useless information. James Pinnell 02:48, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.