Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Eurobeat

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 18:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Super Eurobeat

Wikipedia is not a directory. However, I know that Super Eurobeat is quite an important music record from AVEX Records (See Eurobeat). Delete page but leave redlink stand. SYSS Mouse 03:11, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Keep we have thousands of album pages, this is just like a merger of several of them. Kappa 03:16, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, pointless list, trivial. Megan1967 07:58, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, this is the AVEX compilation. Not sure if we want to have the lists all in the same article or what. --SPUI (talk) 08:33, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep --Fuzzball! (talk) 09:08, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• While it is good to have lots of album pages, I don't see what's so encyclopedic about album compilations like the 'best <number> songs in <genre> and <year>'. As such, delete. Radiant_* 09:10, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • In this case, the compilations seem to be better known than the original albums, assuming they even exist. --SPUI (talk) 09:35, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes as I see it, basically these compilations are the most important part of the genre. Kappa 11:35, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Really? How odd. Well, I admit I'm not very familiar with the genre, so abstain. Radiant_* 12:39, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
• keep this as well Yuckfoo 01:40, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Rewrite RadioActive 17:58, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.