Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperShadow (2)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep -- grm_wnr Esc 20:20, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SuperShadow

Article was previously nominated for deletion on 2005-03-28. The result was keep. For discussion see Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/SuperShadow

nn forum poster/owner. "all information regarding SuperShadow is above top secret (classified at the highest level). Currently, nothing is known about SuperShadow except that SS is very close, personal friends with George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars" says it all. --Zoe 06:53, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per Zoe. --Nandesuka 12:04, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. He has shown to be quite significant in the online community. He has maintained a site for six years that contiues to fool star wars fans. He has kept it from being shut down by anybody, and lies all the time on his site. He is just short of being an internet phenomenon. --139.55.52.221 12:13, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The claim that "nothing is known" is false. --elvenscout742 18:08, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The majority of all vandalism to Star Wars articles are SuperShadow spawned. This article is utterly invaluable for explaining why all edits adding information derived from SS are reverted on sight. --Maru 19:13, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: SS derived-vandalism is not minor at all; check the edit histories of Yoda and Darth Maul for especially hard-hit articles, and see how many reverts are for SS data. (In fact, such a search would undercount the severity significantly, since it isn't always mentioned in the edit summaries (I myself am very lax in this area).) --Maru 02:34, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Nothing's changed since the last time we agreed to keep it. --Phil Welch 21:58, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Phil and Maru. --Nufy8 01:32, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Maru. --Jon Hart 02:28, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable website. --LtNOWIS 07:06, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, well known fraud, repeated SS data vandalism on Yoda and other pages, recreated SS crap such as 'Darth Rage', and notable pop culture figure. --Lord Patrick 09:08, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. --Rich Farmbrough
• Keep, as User:LtNOWIS said, "notable website." --The Wookieepedian 17:10, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep Please, is there a reason zoe and nandesuka keep trying to erase everything that seems strange? --Yuckfoo 22:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.