Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SupeRoute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Davewild (talk) 10:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SupeRoute

SupeRoute (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Articles should assert the notability of the subject with verifiable sources. This subject, a proposed light rail scheme, could turn out to be notable but without any sources it is unclear how serious a proposal it is and until such time as there are appropriate sources available this article should be deleted. Adambro (talk) 14:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment Found a brief mention of this scheme at http://archive.nics.gov.uk/rd/070116a-rd.htm but not really convinced this would justify an article unless more info can be found. Adambro (talk) 14:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

• It's in the midst of an "economic feasibility study." Classic WP:CRYSTAL. Delete. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Given the speed that construction projects in the UK usually progress at, it could be many years off. Assuming it happens at all. RMHED (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.