Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunstorm Interactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Agent 86 00:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sunstorm Interactive

Seems to be unnotable, but I could be wrong, I am only going by the article. Somewhere between Weak Delete and Neutral. Just H 20:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. —Wrathchild ^(talk) 20:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - [1] - Designers of a number of notable games, including the Deer Hunter series of games. Torinir _{( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options )} 21:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I'd keep it, too. While I'm not a fan of the company, it would be a shame to lose the information just because you had never heard of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.195.148.73 (talk • contribs)

• Keep - As above a real company that has developed Deer Hunter along with some other well known games. WCX 23:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Not only have they published some successful titles (and will doubtless have some good sources of info dotted around), but as the IGN link Torinir supplied says, they created (or at least popularized) a game genre. QuagmireDog 04:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, By my prejudice I say strong delete for the Deep Hunter series, but alas, that alone says its notable enough to keep for clean up. Needs attention from a WP:V nitpicker. --MegaBurn 06:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• keep If they made Deer Hunter, they are definitely a notable budget publisher. — brighterorange (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Several recoginsable games in that list, it just needs some more sourcing. The Kinslayer 19:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.