Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunshine Nee (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus, keep by default. - Richardcavell 01:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sunshine Nee

This article survived a "no consensus" vote on AfD. The primary reason no consensus was reached was because of the idea that a listing on IMDb made her notable. As the IMDb is an index of all persons, contrary to Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, it cannot possibly be a criteria for notability in this article. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 13:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - I don't know that many porn names, but she seems non-notable. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Expand - The article needed expanded before, it got kept and no one did anything. She just needs expanded. SandwichHat 16:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Appears to fail WP:PORN BIO, such as it is. Fan1967 18:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - still requires expanding but obviously no one has taken up the task. here's a link that may help her cause. http://excaliburfilms.com/pornlist/starpgs/Sunshine.htm. Also, she is more of an "underground" porn star - appearing mostly in reality porn websites and the like. I've seen porn star articles on wikipedia with alot less movie titles to their name. --Philo 12:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, & Fan1967. I find the suggestion the article could be make encyclopedic if someone else would expand the article to be unhelpful, nor does the notation that she is an "underground" porn star make her more notable. Tychocat 05:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. Hong Qi Gong 19:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.