Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suno (card game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 03:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suno (card game)

Suno (card game) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not for games made up in school one day to play with friends during lunchtime. Deli nk 16:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:MADEUP. —dustmite 17:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• Suno is a real card game and should not be deleted from wikipedia. The author of the article is using wikipedia to spread the popularity of the card game. Suno has since become a popular game with more than 500 students playing regularly. Anyone atempting to delete this article is therefore disrespectful to Sam Butler, the creator of the game, Peter McLeod, the author of this article and the 500 students playing Suno. This article is not harming anyone and deleting the article will breach the freedom of speech that the internet, and primarily wikipedia, has worked to create over the years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.109.229 (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

— 86.156.109.229 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• • Delete per this guy. JuJube 19:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not for things which make finding ghits complicated by mimicking Southern University of New Orleans but actually have no relevant ones. Er, I mean unverifiable. - Revolving Bugbear 18:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Obvious case of a non-notable vanity article created by school kids with too much time on their hands. PCock 18:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:OR, WP:NFT, the list of reasons goes on and on. Wildthing61476 18:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• SAVE Can anybody name part of the Wikipedia Deletion Policy that this article violates? Deletion of this article will show facist tendencies of the persons involved in the deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris thompson100 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC) — Chris thompson100 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Comment. To reply to Chris: people have already mentioned various policies that the article violates. RobJ1981 18:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• COMMENT SUNO WAS NOT CREATED OVER LUNCHTIME IT WAS CREATED FOR PLAYING AT LUNCHTIME. TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris thompson100 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• Comment May I ask why it matters if this article is on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christ1000 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC) — Christ1000 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Comment First of all, we are trying to build and encyclopedia, and as stated a number of times, there are numerous articles that talk about what content is allowed and not allowed. Secondly, we great frown upon sock puppetry, so the creation of duplicate accounts to add comments is not looked kindly on. Thirdly, please refrain from the personal attacks as you made earlier. Wildthing61476 19:57, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per the nominator and in fact everyone except the spas. Edward321 (talk) 00:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.