Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sundowner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete; default to keep. - Philippe 03:45, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sundowner

Sundowner (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Not a disambig page, doesn't link to any articles, more like a dictionary definition. Has been transwikied to Wiktionary. Corvus cornix_talk 23:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. The Wiktionary entry seems to cover all the bases, and some of this article is rather far-fetched (for example, sundown town ≠ sundowner). The Sundowners, which I saw in its first run when I was 11 years old, remains one of my favorite films, but I don't see a need for this article, either in itself or as a dab page. Deor (talk) 01:20, 2 April 2008
• Comment - I can vouch for the medical term as a familair one used in hospital. Tricky really, agree with whole dictionary/'pedia interface thing. I can't make up my mind....Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - needs serious cleanup, as most of these uses are probably not notable, but if more references are provided for those that are, this could become an acceptable disambiguation page. Terraxos (talk) 05:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • But it isn't a disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages point to pages where there are articles. This isn't pointing to articles. Corvus cornix_talk 16:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Transwiki Both to make sure that everything is included, and because I think replacing the page with a {{wi}} is better than deleting it outright. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 14:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, but if the decision is to delete I'll write a separate article on Sundowner wind, which we need (I contributed that part, and it's the only part with a cite). Maybe I should anyway. All that stuff in that very odd "disambig" page needs cites. Antandrus (talk) 04:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Soundowner wind should be its own article, anyway. Good on you for that. Corvus cornix_talk 21:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
• Move the text on sundowner winds to sundowner wind and delete the rest. -Neitherday (talk) 06:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.