Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summit Middle School (Coquitlam)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep: the nomination was withdrawn, and other editors initially favoring deletion now favor keeping the article, so I have closed under the speedy keep guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 02:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Summit Middle School (Coquitlam)
Nothing notable asserted about this middle school. Arthurrh 18:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It's been fixed appropriately. Well done. Arthurrh 02:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Delete.Nothing notable about this middle school is asserted in the article. The content is far less encyclopedic than other middle school article's. —C.Fred (talk) 23:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Delete- We cannot have articles for all the middle school. Masterpiece2000 12:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)- Keep - Now the article is fine. Masterpiece2000 02:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Why not? DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I can find a number of articles about the school that demonstrate some notability. For instance:
- They won the Maple Leaf Junior Tour's Girls national championship title for gold — a national sports award for young girls. Keel collects national title, Coquitlam Now. New Westminster, B.C.: Sep 5, 2007. pg. 35.
- They were noted for having one of their teachers play one of the leads in a theatrical production of Aladdin, designed for middle school students. Principal role for Summit teacher, Coquitlam Now. New Westminster, B.C.: Dec 8, 2006. pg. 23.
- They helped in the production of another play, MAGIC!, designed and run by middle school students. Theatrix makes the MAGIC! happen: Musical adventure written and staged by local young people, Coquitlam Now. New Westminster, B.C.: Apr 12, 2006. pg. 17.
- They were chosen for a session of "Odyssey of the Mind", an NASA-backed international educational program. Odyssey of the Mind founder to visit Summit Middle School, Simone Blais. Coquitlam Now. New Westminster, B.C.: Nov 15, 2003. pg. 15.
- They had a student win one of BC's Junior Achievement of B.C.'s 2000 Awards. Kudos, The Vancouver Sun. Vancouver, B.C.: Jul 24, 2000. pg. C.8.
- They participated in a very successful high/middle school partnership program which attrached media attention. Big buddies make a lasting impression on young student, Scott Simpson. The Vancouver Sun. Vancouver, B.C.: Jun 14, 2000. pg. B.1.FRO.
- The school itself was part of the BC Ministry of Education's new cost-cutting construction measures, and one of the first two to be built to those specifications. Economics 101: Expensive schools off the curriculum, Suzanne Fournier, Staff Reporter. The Province. Vancouver, B.C.: Oct 5, 1997. pg. A.24.
- I think this demonstrates that it has sufficient notability. --Haemo 23:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- The problem is the article is written in a completely different direction. Instead of talking about the school being one of the first built under the ministry's new cost-cutting rules, the article talks about the hallway being narrow. That's one of the major problems I see with the article: the aspects covered on the subject or non-encyclopedic, and the overall tone is non-encyclopedic. —C.Fred (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep as nomination withdrawn - nomination properly withdrawn on the addition of content and independent, verifiable sources to meet WP:N. TerriersFan 04:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —TerriersFan 04:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)}}
- Keep. My goodness, we have a ridiculous number of third party sources here which establish notability. RFerreira 08:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Since my first assessment, the article has been improved substantially, including the third-party sources RFerreira mentioned above. Accordingly, I have changed my recommendation. —C.Fred (talk) 15:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's obviously been fixed up! --Galaxy250 22:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Good work! Nice article Victuallers 22:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.