Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suitwanker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 21:56, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Suitwanker
I didn't nominate this article, it was nominated by some anon. However, he didn't create the vfd2 or vfd3 entries, so I'm doing that now. Also, I reformatted some of the votes already placed. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 18:49, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Against. It should be noted as a colloquial/slang term and cleaned up. But I don't see why delete it. --69.158.34.74 19:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. For. While I think it nicely describes the parasitical technological ignorati it seems redundant given 'suit' (or more simply 'wanker') and is redundant. (Comment by 80.4.224.6 (talk ยท contribs))
- Keep. For. This is a cool term I heard about while reading Slashdot. It deserves a place in an encyclopedia. 63.201.91.87 07:51, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Cleanup Cleanup. It is not synonymous with another word. "Suit" means any executive. While "wanker" is literally "one who masturbates", its common usage describes an idle, lazy, or parasitic person. "Parasuit" might be a cleaner term. Lheal 17:01, 22 July 2005 (UTC). (User's first edit to Wikipedia)
- Delete. Zero hits for it as one word, and only 2 for "Suit wanker". Niteowlneils 19:33, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete even if common usage is establish, this is no more than a dicdef. DES 19:58, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Against. (or maybe For? Am I doing this right, newbies?) Neologism, evidentally. -R. fiend
- Speedy delete as attack page. --Idont Havaname 23:59, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.