Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suit of Lights

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. No Guru 19:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Suit of Lights

This band article was tagged for speedy deletion, but the band contains members of other, notable bands, so I'm listing here to get consensus. I'm unsure whether or not this band passes WP:MUS, or whether material should be merged. Hence, no vote. Oldelpaso 22:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep By having those (multiple) notable members, they pass WP:MUSIC. And... that's it. -- Kicking222 01:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per kicking222. I also removed the speedy tag from Joe Darone. --Joelmills 03:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking (and because, unlike so many of these bands that get nominated, I've actually heard of them.) GassyGuy 15:43, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Defintely passes WP:MUS for several reasons: 1. Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network (#3 most added on CMJ), 2. Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable (Thursday's last album has sold over 400,000 units! If that isn't notable, then what is?), 3. Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture (All Music Guide, Amplifier Magazine, Big Takeover, Lost At Sea, etc..etc...) 63.163.57.36 01:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Move to Suit of Lights (band). Suit of Lights should be bullfighting related. -- GWO

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.