Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suit Day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowball delete. Common sense, people. Non-notable crystalballery. Sr13 17:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suit Day

Suit Day (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Somewhere buried in all the sound and fury I think I finally found what this article was about, which is an unreleased and thus unverifiable student film and thus not notable. (Closest guideline would be WP:NFT.) Crystallina 03:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete - as a non-notable student project, and crystalballery. --Haemo 04:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete wow. it's just a drawing board for a film that will not necessarily even get made.Sci girl 04:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete, speedily if possible, per all above. This is a student film (presumptively non-notable) which hasn't been completed yet (crystalballery), yet the article goes into a level of detail that would be considered excessive for an article about most mainstream films. Due to the surrealist nature of the film, this article looks like a long stretch of non sequiturs. --Metropolitan90 06:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I lobbied to have no asserted notability films speediable, but there was no motion on that front. --Haemo 06:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• Very, Very Strong Delete - wow. all that for a student film that isn't even released yet. It certainly made my head spin with madness and crystalballness. -=Elfin=-³⁴¹ 06:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. The film is billed as an exquisite corpse and from some of these headings ("feel free to add your own bits!" or whatever) it appears they're trying to use WP as a gathering point for its actual development. plus non-notable, plus crystal ball, plus unverifiable. tomasz. 10:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
• Snow delete I think the point has been made Whsitchy 14:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.